The 2nd Circuit recently found that the sale of counterfeit branded goods was not covered as advertising injury under a commercial general liability policy. In USF&G v. Fendi Adele S.R.L., 823 F.3d 146 (2nd Cir. 2016), applying New York law, upheld the district court’s ruling that the commercial general liability policy issued by USF&G did not cover sales of counterfeit goods because the sale of counterfeit goods did not qualify as an advertising injury. The court found that the sale and resulting injury of counterfeit goods was not, itself, an advertisement of the counterfeit goods. The court drew a distinction between the act of placing a counterfeit branded label on a handbag and the act of actually soliciting customers through advertisements.
A Respected Expert Witness And Authority On Insurance Law In The U.S.
What’s in a Label? Coverage for advertising injury?
On Behalf of Steven Plitt, Insurance Expert | Dec 7, 2017 | Firm News
Categories
Archives
Recent Posts
- RECOUPMENT OF DEFENSES COSTS WHEN OFFERING A RESERVATION OF RIGHTS DEFENSE
- REGULAR USE EXCEPTION UPHELD BY TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS IN A PERSONAL UNINSURED MOTORIST POLICY
- THE DECK IS NOT STACKED IN FAVOR OF COVERAGE
- THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA RICOCHETS ON THE ISSUE OF COVERAGE FOR DELIBERATE SHOOTINGS UNDER UIM COVERAGE